Chandigarh mayoral polls: Priyanka Chaturvedi demands apology tweet from BJP chief JP Nadda after Supreme Court overturns result


Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Priyanka Chaturvedi took a potshot at BJP chief JP Nadda after the Supreme Court overturned the Chandigarh mayoral election results, originally won by the BJP.

In a post on X, Chaturvedi latched on to Nadda’s earlier congratulatory message to the BJP unit upon their “win” in the Chandigarh mayoral polls. Making a play on the BJP president’s tweet, she accused the party of attempting to undermine democracy and highlighted the victory of the INDIA bloc despite the odds.

After the results were declared in the Chandigarh mayoral elections on January 30, Nadda had posted on X, “Congratulations to @BJP4Chandigarh Unit for winning the Mayor election. Under the leadership of Prime Minister Shri @narendramodi Ji, UTs have witnessed record development. That the INDI Alliance fought their first electoral battle and still lost to BJP shows that neither their arithmetic is working nor their chemistry.”

But the Supreme Court later reversed the election outcome after finding merit in a petition by the defeated AAP candidate alleging forgery and foul play during the vote count.

Suggesting an apology tweet for the alleged cheating in the mayoral election, Chaturvedi said, “Tweet suggestion: Apologies to Chandigarh for cheating in the Mayor election. Under the leadership of PM Modiji, India has witnessed record breaking attempts to make democracy ineffective. The INDIA alliance has delivered their first electoral win despite BJPs forged arithmetic & chemistry results.”

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court declared AAP’s Kuldeep Kumar the winner of the Chandigarh mayoral election. The court’s ruling comes after Kumar challenged the initial results where the Returning Officer had invalidated eight votes, leading to a BJP victory.

The top court bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also initiated criminal proceedings under Section 340 of the CrPC against Returning Officer Anil Masih for making false statements before the court.

The bench noted that Anil Masih made a “deliberate effort to deface eight ballots” cast in favour of the petitioner.

“In this court yesterday, the officer made a statement that he had done so because he found the ballots were defaced. As a matter of fact, it is recorded that none of the ballots were defaced,” the bench said.

Published By:

Devika Bhattacharya

Published On:

Feb 21, 2024



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *