Should you prioritize your emergency fund over retirement savings?

January 3, 2022
Should you prioritize your emergency fund over retirement savings?


You’ll often hear that it’s important to save for retirement during your working years because Social Security won’t pay you enough to keep up with your bills. And there’s a lot of truth to that.

Social Security will replace about 40% of your income if you’re an average earner. That figure, however, assumes benefits aren’t cut in the future, which is a possibility due to the program’s financial problems that lawmakers have yet to fix.

Meanwhile, it’s debatable as to how much of your former paycheck you’ll need to live comfortably during retirement. Some financial experts insist you should plan to need 70% to 80% of your former earnings. Others might say you can get by on less.

 The Daily Money:   Get our latest personal finance stories in your inbox

But most likely, 40% of your former income won’t cut it if you want to have enough money in retirement to not only pay for essentials, but also, have cash left over to enjoy your newfound free time. For that reason, it’s important to save for your senior years during your working years, whether in an employer-sponsored 401(k) plan or an IRA you open and manage yourself.

What if you don’t have any money in your savings account for emergencies? Or what if you have a partial emergency fund but still have a ways to go before it’s complete? Should you be saving for retirement in that scenario, or diverting all of your extra money to savings?

Focus on your immediate needs first

If you were to lose your job or encounter an unplanned expense your paycheck can’t cover, your emergency fund would most likely be the one cash source that could bail you out. That’s why having a full emergency fund should trump all other financial goals, including building a retirement nest egg.

Granted, if you have money in an IRA or 401(k) and no emergency fund, you could tap your retirement savings if the need for cash were to arise. But doing so before age 59 ½ triggers a 10% penalty on the amount you remove.

If you encounter a $4,000 emergency expense and you’re forced to withdraw that money from your IRA at age 40, when you’re not old enough to avoid a penalty, you’ll give up $400, just like that. You’re actually better off completing your emergency fund and then setting money aside for retirement.

What constitutes a complete emergency fund? It depends on your needs and circumstances.

Generally speaking, you’ll want a minimum of three months’ worth of essential expenses in savings before moving on to fund your retirement plan. Many financial experts feel that six months’ worth of bills is a more appropriate amount for an emergency fund. If you agree, you may want to wait even longer before putting money away for retirement.

► Retirement strategies:  24% of Americans don’t have one. Do you?

An exception to the rule

If you don’t have any money set aside for emergencies, then every extra dollar you have should probably go into your savings account. But if you have some money available for emergencies, just not enough, then you may want to fund a retirement plan before your emergency fund in one situation – when you have a 401(k) and are eligible for a match from your employer.

If you don’t put enough money into your 401(k) to snag that company match, you’ll end up giving up free cash. As long as you have a decent chunk of emergency savings, you may, in this specific situation, want to put money into your 401(k) despite your emergency fund not being complete.

But otherwise, when it comes to building savings, your emergency fund should take priority over retirement savings. While it’s good to start building your nest egg from an early age, you have your whole career to fund your IRA or 401(k), whereas an emergency could strike tomorrow. If you don’t have adequate funds in savings, you could face a world of dire consequences.

► Retirement planning:  Did you know the IRA deadline isn’t Dec. 31?

Alert: highest cash back card we’ve seen now has 0% intro APR►  until 2023

Offer from the Motley Fool: If you’re using the wrong credit or debit card, it could be costing you serious money. Our expert loves this top pick, which features a 0% intro APR until 2023, an insane cash back rate of up to 5%, and all somehow for no annual fee. 

In fact, this card is so good that our expert even uses it personally. Click here to read our full review for free and apply in just 2 minutes. 

Read our free review

We’re firm believers in the Golden Rule, which is why editorial opinions are ours alone and have not been previously reviewed, approved, or endorsed by included advertisers. The Ascent does not cover all offers on the market. Editorial content from The Ascent is separate from The Motley Fool editorial content and is created by a different analyst team.The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.


Source link

Article Categories:

Life is like a running cycle right! I am a news editor at TIMES. Collecting News is my passion. Because my visitors have the right to know the truth and perfectly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 8 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here