Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
This week, Donald Trump picked Indian-American entrepreneur Sriram Krishnan as Senior White House Policy Advisor on Artificial Intelligence. The appointment of Chennai-born techie Sriram Krishnan as Senior White House Policy Advisor on AI has triggered a fresh debate that pits Silicon Valley’s tech titans against the populist MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement. At the heart of this clash is a growing tension over the future of US immigration policy and the role that foreign talent, particularly from countries like India, should play in shaping America’s technological landscape.Following a post by an X user, who wrote, “Did any of yall vote for this Indian to run America”, David Sacks, a prominent Silicon Valley entrepreneur and ally of Krishnan, has once again stepped forward to defend his friend amid increasing criticism.
Sacks responded by emphasizing Krishnan’s qualifications and US citizenship. A community note on the post had already clarified that Krishnan, a US citizen, was selected by President-elect Donald Trump to advise on AI policy, but Sacks took the opportunity to rebut further: “Sriram has been a US citizen for a decade. He’s not ‘running America.’ He’s advising on A.I. policy. He will have no influence over US immigration policy. These attacks have become crude, and not in the holiday spirit. I’m signing off now. Have a merry Christmas.” (sic)
ALSO READ: Sriram Krishnan, who worked for Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, is now Trump’s AI advisor
Laura Loomer’s criticism and the MAGA backlash
The venture capitalist’s incoming move met with a similar backlash, especially from Laura Loomer. Sacks’ defense follows a string of attacks from far-right critics, including conservative commentator Laura Loomer.
Loomer has been vocal in her disapproval of Krishnan’s appointment, accusing him of betraying the “America First” agenda by advocating for immigration reforms that she claims would undermine American workers. Loomer’s criticisms focus on Krishnan’s support for removing country-specific caps on green cards, which she argues would prioritize foreign workers over American talent.
Condemning the “disturbing” appointment of Krishnan as part of the Trump administration 2.0, Loomer wrote on X, “It’s alarming to see the number of career leftists who are now being appointed to serve in Trump’s admin when they share views that are in direct opposition to Trump’s America First agenda.”
ALSO READ: Prince Harry was left ‘red-faced’ over Meghan Markle’s actions in Netflix docuseries. The reason might shock youLambasting the move that according to her does not stand by an “America First policy,” she alleged that Sriram Krishnan’s appointment would work against Trump’s immigration control agenda as the Indian American member in his cabinet “wants to REMOVE all restrictions on green card caps in the United States so that foreign students (which makes up 78% of the employees in Silicon Valley) can come to the US and take jobs that should be given to American STEM students.”
Sriram Krishnan gains support
However, Sacks and others have pushed back against these accusations, clarifying Krishnan’s stance on immigration. In a series of posts, Sacks explained that Krishnan’s position on green card reform is focused on removing country-specific caps, which currently create long wait times for applicants from countries like India, while applicants from other nations face little delay. “Sriram didn’t say he wants to remove all caps on green cards.
ALSO READ: Ro Khanna defends Indian-origin Sriram Krishnan’s appointment as Trump’s AI advisor; calls it ‘American exceptionalism’
He said he wants to remove country caps on green cards,” Sacks explained. “Right now, every country in the world gets allocated the same number of green cards, no matter how many qualified applicants it has.”
Indian-American Congressman Ro Khanna also weighed in on the controversy, highlighting that Krishnan’s rise to a senior policy role in the US government reflects the values of American exceptionalism, not a threat to it.
Khanna posted on X: “You fools criticizing @sriramk as Indian born criticize Musk as South African born or Jensen as Taiwanese born. It is GREAT that talent around the world wants to come here, not to China, and that Sriram can rise to the highest levels. It’s called American exceptionalism.”
Khanna’s remarks underscore a key point in the ongoing debate: the notion that the US benefits from attracting global talent, especially in the rapidly evolving fields of technology and AI, which require highly skilled workers.
ALSO READ: Panama Canal, Canada and Greenland: Why is Trump teasing US expansion? All you need to know
H1-B visa debate and Krishnan’s immigration stance
A major point of contention in this debate is the H-1B visa program, which allows US companies to hire highly skilled foreign workers, particularly in the fields of technology and engineering. Critics of the program, like Loomer, argue that it is often abused by companies seeking to replace American workers with cheaper foreign labor. On the other hand, supporters like Sriram Krishnan argue that such programs are essential for maintaining the US’s competitive edge in global tech, according to a TOI report.
Krishnan has long advocated for reforms to the green card system, emphasizing a merit-based approach that prioritizes highly skilled workers rather than basing allocation on country quotas. Under the current system, applicants from high-demand countries, like India, can face decades-long waiting periods for green cards, while applicants from other nations face little to no delay. By removing country caps, Krishnan believes the US can create a more efficient system that better meets the needs of the country’s technology sector.
