Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Forbes concludes that our collective goal should be to “create spaces where human intelligence remains at the center.” Researchers at Stanford, in turn, highlight the importance of explanations, so AI shares insights, not just outputs.
It can be argued that math problems are not a perfect study subject. I’m sure the invention and wide use of calculators also caused its fair share of fearmongering back in the day: of course, counting on a piece of paper or even in your head wakes up more brain cells than doing so with technology, but is it as horrible as it’s painted?
“Tools like calculators and spreadsheets were designed to assist in specific tasks – such as arithmetic and data analysis – without fundamentally altering the way our brains process information,” says Forbes.
From my point of view, math is a means to an end, all those calculations lead to a bigger goal than simply putting numbers together. Asking ChatGPT instead of thinking or doing research is definitely not as beneficial for the mind, but is it truly the end of our intelligence? The internet opened a whole new world of possibilities, letting us learn about all kinds of stuff quickly instead of spending hours at the library, and this was also once a reason for concern and contempt.
I believe it’s our methods that evolve, not the end goal, and this is not as scary as it looks to some. While generative AI worries are valid, I doubt solving math problems with artificial intelligence instead of the real one will lead to humanity’s decline, but it can also be argued.
What is your stance on the matter? Join our 80 Level Talent platform and our new Discord server, follow us on Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, Telegram, TikTok, and Threads, where we share breakdowns, the latest news, awesome artworks, and more.
